Bailey v. Walker

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WAYNE BAILEY, JR.,1 Respondent BelowAppellant, v. KIM WALKER, Petitioner BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 288, 2011 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County File No. CS04-02974 Petition No. 10-40214 Submitted: July 24, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011 ORDER This 2nd day of August 2011, it appears to the Court that, on July 7, 2011, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the Supreme Court filing fee. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice 1 By Order dated June 13, 2011, the Court sua sponte assigned pseudonyms to the parties. Del. Supr. Ct. R. 7(d).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.