Luigi Crispo v. Elon R. Musk, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATHALEEN ST. JUDE MCCORMICK CHANCELLOR LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 October 13, 2022 Michael Hanrahan, Esquire Samuel L. Closic, Esquire John G. Day, Esquire Robert B. Lackey, Esquire Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A. 1310 N. King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Re: Edward B. Micheletti, Esquire Lauren N. Rosenello, Esquire Ryan M. Lindsay, Esquire Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP One Rodney Square Wilmington, DE 19899 Luigi Crispo v. Elon R. Musk et al., C.A. No. 2022-0666-KSJM Dear Counsel: On October 10, 2022, Plaintiff Luigi Crispo filed a Motion for Judicial Notice of statements made by Defendants Elon R. Musk, X Holdings I, Inc., and X Holdings II, Inc. (“Defendants”) in Twitter Inc. v. Elon R. Musk, et al., C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.1 The following day, I issued a Memorandum Opinion largely granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss2 while identifying one area that warranted supplemental briefing.3 I believe that my decision on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss rendered Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Notice largely moot. If Plaintiff believes that his Motion for Judicial Notice is not moot, he may advance those arguments in the supplemental briefing requested in my October 11 decision. 1 C.A. No. 2022-0666-KSJM, Docket (“Dkt.”) 40. 2 See Dkt. 15, 18, 25, and 35. 3 Dkt. 41. C.A. No. 2022-0666-KSJM October 13, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, /s/ Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick Chancellor cc: Counsel of Record (by File&ServiceXpress) 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
