In re Malotte

Annotate this Case
[Crim. No. 5755. In Bank. Feb. 27, 1956.]

In re MABEL MALOTTE, on Habeas Corpus.

COUNSEL

Leslie C. Gillen and John R. Golden for Petitioner.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, Thomas C. Lynch, District Attorney (San Francisco), Norman Elkington, Chief Assistant District Attorney, and Walter H. Guibbini, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

[1] This proceeding was instituted to secure petitioner's release on bail pending determination of her appeal in People v. Malotte, Crim. No. 5761. On January 27, 1956, we filed our decision affirming the judgment in People v. Malotte, ante, p. 59 [292 P.2d 517], which decision is now final. The order to show cause herein is therefore discharged, the petition for the writ is denied, and petitioner is remanded to custody forthwith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.