Warwick v. Maneely

HELEN L. WARWICK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LAWRENCE MANEELY, Defendant and Appellant; ARTHUR E. HARRAH et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Laurence B. Martin, Dearing & Jertberg, Kenneth G. Avery, Geo. L. Beckwith and Samuel Reisman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rae B. Carter and John D. Chinello for Defendant and Appellant.

Ray W. Hays for Respondents. [40 Cal. App. 2d 814]

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Barnard, P. J.

This is a companion case to 4 Civil No. 2544 (ante, p. 235 [104 PaCal.2d 831]), the decision in which has this day been filed. The plaintiff herein is the daughter of the plaintiff in the other action and she was injured in the same accident. The actions were tried together but separate appeals were taken which have been presented upon separate clerk's transcripts and on the same reporter's transcript. [1] The questions involved and all material matters are identical in the two actions.

For the reasons given in the opinion referred to the judgment in favor of the plaintiff is reversed and the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the defendants Harrah and Stewart & Nuss, Inc., is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.