Peterson v. Corporation of America

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 10464. First Appellate District, Division Two. June 25, 1937.]

LOUISE M. PETERSON, Appellant, v. CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

James F. Peck and Elizabeth M. Maxwell for Appellant.

McKee, Tasheira & Wahrhaftig for Respondents.

OPINION

Spence, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff brought an action similar to that brought in the companion case of Peterson v. Corporation of America, No. 10461, the opinion in which last mentioned case has been this day filed (ante, p. 527 [69 PaCal.2d 904]). Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

The facts in the two cases are substantially the same for the purpose of this discussion except as noted in the opinion in Burg Bros. v. Corporation of America, No. 10463, ante, p. 746 [69 PaCal.2d 908].

[1] The contentions of appellant here are covered by the discussion in the opinions above mentioned and for the reasons stated in said opinions, we conclude that no ground for reversal has been shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Dooling, J., pro tem., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.