Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc.

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 10909. Second Appellate District, Division Two. June 27, 1936.]

SAMUEL L. KURLAND, Appellant, v. FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Don M. Kitzmiller and F. D. R. Moote for Appellant.

Call & Murphey, Robert B. Murphey, Alex W. Davis, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe and Vincent Morgan for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

McComb, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff's complaint, which alleged that defendant had libeled plaintiff.

[1] On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., Civil No. 10908 (ante p. 77 [59 PaCal.2d 203]) the identical questions of law involved in the instant case.

Therefore on the authority of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Crail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.