Berg v. City of Montague

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 8302. Third Dist. Mar. 31, 1954.]

LEWIS BERG et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTAGUE et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Barr & Hammond for Appellant.

Tebbe & Correia for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

PAULSEN, J. pro. tem. fn. *

This is a companion to the case of McNeil v. City of Montague, 3 Civil No. 8301, ante, p. 326 [268 P.2d 498], this day decided.

Except as to parties plaintiff and the allegations of property damage the facts are identical and the allegations of the complaint are substantially the same.

On the authority of McNeil v. City of Montague the judgment is affirmed.

Peek, J., and Schottky, J., concurred.

FN *. Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.