Leach v. Looney (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseOn July 9, 2012, Petitioner filed in the circuit court a pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1. Petitioner then filed this pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have the circuit judge enter a final order on the Rule 37.1 petition. In his response, the circuit judge stated that he was unaware that the final order was never entered until this mandamus action was filed. The circuit court appended to the response a copy of the final order denying the Rule 37.1 petition that was subsequently entered. Because the circuit judge acted on the petition, this mandamus action was rendered moot. However, the Supreme Court took the opportunity to urge all judicial districts to ensure that judges are aware of the state of the docket for all cases in their courts.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.