Cuatepotzo v. Hobbs (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAppellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to rape and residential burglary and was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 180 months’ imprisonment. Two years later, Appellant filed a pro se petition for declaratory judgment and for writ of mandamus against the Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) concerning his eligibility for parole. The circuit court declined to grant the relief sought. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the arguments raised in Appellant’s petition did not entitle Appellant to relief by means of a declaratory judgment or a writ of mandamus, and therefore, the circuit court did not err in dismissing the petition.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.