T. Ricks LLC v. Kent (Majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2014 Ark. 269 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-873 T. RICKS, LLC; RICK ADAMS; AND THE RICK AND LANAN ADAMS LIVING TRUST APPELLANTS Opinion Delivered June 5, 2014 APPEAL FROM THE WHITE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CV-2011-668-3] V. RICK KENT; BARBARA KENT; KKC, INC.; MID-STATE INVESTMENTS, LLC; AND MID-STATE SERVICE CO., INC. APPELLEES HONORABLE CRAIG HANNAH, JUDGE APPEAL DISMISSED. JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Associate Justice Appellants T.Ricks, LLC, Rick Adams, and the Rick and Lanan Adams Living Trust (Adams) have attempted to file an interlocutory appeal from an order of the White County Circuit Court denying their motion to remove Robert Hudgins from his court-appointed position of Special Receiver. However, because the transcript in this case was not timely filed, we dismiss this appeal. Adams asserts that an interlocutory appeal of the order entered on August 21, 2013, denying his motion to remove the Special Receiver was proper pursuant to Rule 2(a)(7) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure Civil. However, Rule 5(a) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure Civil states that when an appeal is taken from an interlocutory order under Rule 2(a)(6) or (7), the record must be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court within thirty (30) days from the entry of such order. Here the transcript Cite as 2014 Ark. 269 was not filed until October 3, 2013. Accordingly, we cannot consider Adams s arguments on appeal. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Milburn, 352 Ark. 144, 100 S.W.3d 674 (2003). Timely filing of a transcript is a jurisdictional question, and the failure to timely file deprives this court of authority to hear the appeal. Palmer v. Evans, 256 Ark. 917, 511 S.W.2d 157 (1974). Appeal dismissed. Special Justice LINDSEY J. FAIRLEY joins in this opinion. HANNAH, C.J., not participating. Cearly Law Firm, by: Robert M. Cearly, Jr.; Hyden, Miron & Foster, PLLC, by: James W. Hyden; and Brian G. Brooks, Attorney at Law, PLLC, by: Brian G. Brooks, for appellants. Dover, Dixon, Horne, PLLC, by: Thomas S. Stone and William C. Bird III, for appellees. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
