Banks v. Hobbs (Per Curiam)
Annotate this Case
In 1999, Appellant was convicted of rape and sentenced as a habitual offender to a term of forty years imprisonment. In 2000, Appellant was convicted of first-degree battery and sentenced as a habitual offender to sixty years' imprisonment, with the term to run concurrently with the previously imposed sentence. In 2010, Appellant filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending that the records supervisor at the prison facility where he was an inmate would not credit him with his earned meritorious good time for purposes of determining parole eligibility. The circuit court denied the petition. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Appellant's brief was insufficient for review and that Appellant failed to show he was entitled to a writ of mandamus.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.