Gordon v. State (Majority)
Annotate this CaseAppellant was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to a term of life imprisonment plus fifteen years. On appeal, Appellant argued that the circuit court abused its discretion (1) in admitting evidence of a jailhouse fight in the State's rebuttal case, and (2) in limiting the testimony of an expert witness. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) Appellant failed to preserve his first argument for review on appeal; and (2) the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the expert witness's testimony on the subject of what a person experiences when he or she shoots another person.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.