Wetzel v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Sys.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2010 Ark. 31
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No.
FREDERICK S. WETZEL,
09-1410
Opinion Delivered January
APPELLANT,
VS.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
APPELLEE,
21, 2010
CERTIFIED QUESTION OF LAW
FROM THE UNITED STATES
BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN
DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CERTIFIED QUESTION ACCEPTED.
PER CURIAM
In accordance with section 2(D)(3) of Amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution
and Rule 6-8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of the State of
Arkansas, Judge Richard D. Taylor of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, filed a motion and certification order with our clerk on December 30,
2009. The bankruptcy court requests that we answer one question of Arkansas law that may
be determinative of a cause now pending in that court, because it appears that there is no
controlling precedent in the decisions of the Arkansas Supreme Court.
After a review of the certifying court’s analysis and explanation of the need for this
court to answer the question of law presently pending in that court, we accept certification
of the following question:
Whether an affidavit of lost mortgage with a copy of the mortgage appended, or
merely a copy of an admittedly lost original mortgage, separately or collectively
recorded, constitutes constructive notice sufficient to defeat the claim of a bona fide
Cite as 2010 Ark. 31
purchaser under the laws of the State of Arkansas.
This per curiam order constitutes notice of our acceptance of the certification of
question of law. For purposes of the pending proceeding in this court, the following
requirements are imposed:
A.
Time limits under Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-4 will be calculated from
the date of this per curiam order accepting certification. The plaintiff in the
underlying action, Frederick S. Wetzel, is designated the moving party and will
be denoted as the “Petitioner,” and his brief is due thirty days from the date of
this per curiam; the defendant, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.,
shall be denoted as the “Respondent” and its brief shall be due thirty days after
the filing of Petitioner’s brief. Petitioner may file a reply brief within fifteen
days after Respondent’s brief is filed.
See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-4.
B.
The briefs shall comply with this court’s rules as in other cases except for the
briefs’ content. Only the following items required in Arkansas Supreme Court
Rule 4-2(a) shall be included:
(3)
Point on appeal which shall correspond to the certified question of law
to be answered in the federal bankruptcy court’s certification order.
(4)
Table of authorities.
(6)
Statement of the case which shall correspond to the facts relevant to the
certified question of law as stated in the federal bankruptcy court’s
certification order.
(7)
Argument.
(8)
Addendum, if necessary and appropriate.
(9)
Cover for briefs.
See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a).
-2-
Cite as 2010 Ark. 31
C.
Oral argument will only be permitted if this court concludes that it will be
helpful for presentation of the issue.
See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-1.
D.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-6 applies to amicus curiae briefs.
See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-6.
E.
This matter will be processed as any case on appeal.
See Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals and Rules of Appellate Procedure–
Civil.
F.
Rule XIV of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar shall apply to the
attorneys for the Petitioner and Respondent.
See Ark. Bar Adm. R. XIV.
Certified Question Accepted.
-3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.