Christopher L. Branning v. State of Arkansas

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS  No.  CR07­789  CHRISTOPHER BRANNING,  APPELLANT,  VS.  STATE OF ARKANSAS,  APPELLEE,  Opinion Delivered  12­13­07  MOTION  TO  COMPEL  COMPLETION  OF THE RECORD  MOTION GRANTED.  PER CURIAM  The attorney for appellant has filed this motion to compel completion of the record  in this appeal.  He states that the record has not been completed due to grave illness of the  court reporter.  The State responds and states that finding another reporter to complete the  transcript would be appropriate, see Whitten v. State, 332 Ark. 373, 373­75, 965 S.W.2d 124  (1998) (per curiam), a solution the circuit judge’s office has already begun to pursue.  We grant appellant’s motion and order that the court reporter’s tapes be released for  transcription, and, if necessary, certification by another reporter.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.