Mark Holsombach v. Honorable David Reynolds, Circuit Judge
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No.
CR 07-641
Opinion Delivered
MARK HOLSOMBACH
Petitioner
September 13, 2007
PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF
MANDAMUS [CIRCUIT COURT OF
VAN BUREN COUNTY, CR 2004-121,
CR 2004-30]
v.
HON. DAVID REYNOLDS, CIRCUIT
JUDGE
Respondent
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
On June 19, 2007, petitioner Mark Holsombach filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this
court contending that the Honorable David Reynolds, Circuit Judge, had failed to act within a
reasonable time on a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37.1
filed by petitioner on February 20, 2007. After the mandamus action was filed, Judge Reynolds
responded by informing this court that, contrary to the Certificate of Service appended to the
mandamus petition, petitioner had not served him with a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus.
It was petitioner’s responsibility pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-1(a) to serve the respondent
with a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus and provide a Certificate of Service reflecting that
he had done so. Although petitioner was advised by respondent’s response to the mandamus petition
of his failure to comply with this rule, he has not shown that he has taken remedial action. As a
result, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
