Hans C. Hess v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
HANS C. HESS
Appellant
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Appellee
CR 05-164
Opinion Delivered
April 13, 2006
PRO SE PETITION FOR REHEARING
[CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, CR
93-2251, CR 97-1922, HON. TIMOTHY D. FOX,
JUDGE]
PETITION DENIED
PER CURIAM
Hans Hess filed in the trial court a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Act
1780 of 2001, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-112-201–207 (Supp. 2003). The trial court denied
the petition without a hearing, and we affirmed. Hess v. State, CR 05-164 (Ark. February 16, 2006)
(per curiam). Appellant now brings this petition for rehearing of that decision.
Rule 2-3(g) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court provides that a petition for rehearing
should be used to call attention to specific errors of law or fact which the opinion is thought to
contain and not to repeat arguments already considered and rejected by this court. The petition must
cite to facts the appellant contends were overlooked and provide references to the abstract or
addendum as required by Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-3(h). Appellant here fails to provide any such citations
and he alleges no error of law or fact that would merit rehearing.
In his petition for rehearing, appellant raises issues already addressed by this court. Appellant
fails to point to any error of law or fact as required by Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-3 in support of his
allegations. As he has stated no basis upon which to grant rehearing, we accordingly deny his
petition.
Petition denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
