Stark Ligon, as Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct v. Larry G. Dunklin

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Stark LIGON, as Executive Director of the Supreme Court  Committee on Professional Conduct v. Larry G. DUNKLIN  04­661  ___ S.W.3d ___  Supreme Court of Arkansas  Opinion delivered June 15, 2006  ATTORNEY & CLIENT – REGULATION OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT – BRIEFING SCHEDULE  ORDERED. – Following receipt of the special judge’s findings of fact and conclusion  of law and recommendation of sanctions, the supreme court directed the clerk to set  briefing schedules for the respective parties.  Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional  Conduct, by: Michael E. Harmon, for appellant.  Richard E. Holiman, for appellee.  PER  CURIAM.  Special  Judge,  Jack  L.  Lessenberry,  filed  his  Findings  of  Fact  and  Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of Sanctions on May 22, 2006.  See Section 13  of  the  Procedures  Regulating  Professional  Conduct.  The  parties  now  must  file  briefs.  Section  13D.  We  request  the  Supreme  Court  Clerk  to  set  briefing  schedules  for  the  respective parties. Moreover, we bring to the parties’ attention our most recent case of Ligon ___________________________  PER CURIAM  ­ 10  LIGON  v. DUNKLIN  Cite as 36_ Ark. ___ (2006)  Page 2  v. Newman, 365 Ark. 510, ___ S.W.3d ___ (2006), for whatever relevance it may have in this  appeal.  See also Ligon v. Newman, 361 Ark. 354, ___ S.W.3d ___ (2005) (per curiam). ___________________________  PER CURIAM  ­ 10 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.