Clarence Manning v. State of Arkansas

Annotate this Case
              Clarence MANNING v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-102                                          ___ S.W.2d ___

                    Supreme Court of Arkansas
               Opinion delivered February 17, 1997


Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk -- good cause for
     granting. -- An admission by an attorney for a criminal
     defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake
     on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the
     clerk.

     Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.
     Chris Jester, for appellant.
     No response.

     Per Curiam.
     Clarence Manning, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a
rule on the clerk.
     His attorney, Chris Jester, admits in his motion that the
record was tendered 48 days late due to a mistake on his part.
     We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney
for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.  See
In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per
curiam).
     The motion is, therefore, granted.  A copy of this opinion
will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.