Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/5/259/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/5/259/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Fenwick v. Sears' Administrators, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 259 259 (1803)
Fenwick v. Sears' Administrators
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 259
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
Syllabus
An administrator, having had letters of administration in Maryland, before the separation of the District of Columbia from the original states, cannot after that separation maintain an action in that part of the District of Maryland by virtue of those letters of administration, but must take out new letters within the District.
The only point decided by the Court was upon the validity of the letters of administration under which this action was brought in the circuit court by the administrators of Sears.
On the 25th of February, the Court gave the following judgment:
"It is decreed by the Court that the defendants Stricker and Payson, not having obtained letters of administration in the District of Columbia, were not competent to maintain this action, and that the Circuit Court of the United States in and for the said District erred in overruling the demurrer. It is therefore considered by the Court that the judgment of the said circuit court on the said demurrer be and the same is hereby reversed, and that judgment thereon be rendered for the defendant in the original action."
