BANKS v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 708 (1969)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 395 U.S. 708
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/395/708/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/395/708/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
BANKS v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 708 (1969)
395 U.S. 708 BANKS v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 670.
Argued April 23, 1969.
Decided June 16, 1969.
Certiorari dismissed.
Thomas J. Klitgaard, by appointment of the Court, 393 U.S. 931, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Edward P. O'Brien, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Louise H. Renne, Deputy Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner did not ask the Supreme Court of California to review the judgment entered by the Court of Appeal in this case. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeal is not a "[f]inal judgment . . . rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had . . . ." 28 U.S.C. 1257, and we lack jurisdiction to review it. The writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- It is so ordered.