BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN v. O'CONNELL, 395 U.S. 210 (1969)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 395 U.S. 210
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/395/210/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/395/210/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN v. O'CONNELL, 395 U.S. 210 (1969)
395 U.S. 210 BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL. v. O'CONNELL ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 158.
Argued January 14, 1969.
Decided May 26, 1969.*
No. 158, 391 F.2d 156; No. 172, 391 F.2d 289, vacated and remanded.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 172, Dirks et al. v. Birkholz et al., on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Arnold B. Elkind argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners in No. 158. David Leo Uelmen argued the cause for petitioners in No. 172. With him on the briefs were David Previant, John J. Naughton, James P. Reedy, and Gerry M. Miller.
Lee Leibik argued the cause for respondents in each case. With him on the briefs was Ruth Weyand.
Harold A. Ross filed briefs for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers as amicus curiae urging reversal in both cases.
Harold C. Heiss filed a brief for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the respective district courts with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot.