PEORIA TRANSIT LINES, INC. v. CITY OF PEORIA, 356 U.S. 225 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
PEORIA TRANSIT LINES, INC. v. CITY OF PEORIA, 356 U.S. 225 (1958) 356 U.S. 225PEORIA TRANSIT LINES, INC., v. CITY OF
PEORIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 780.
Decided March 31, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 11 Ill. 2d 520, 144 N.E.2d 609.
John E. Cassidy, Sr. for appellant.
Robert G. Day for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
356 U.S. 225 (1958) 356 U.S. 225 (1958) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
CANTWELL v. CANTWELL, 356 U.S. 225 (1958) 356 U.S. 225CANTWELL v. CANTWELL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 766.
Decided March 31, 1958.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 237 Ind. 168, 143 N.E.2d 275.
William C. Wines and John C. Lawyer for appellant.
Daniel F. Kelly for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
PEORIA TRANSIT LINES, INC. v. CITY OF PEORIA, 356 U.S. 225 (1958) 356 U.S. 225 PEORIA TRANSIT LINES, INC., v. CITY OF PEORIA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 780.
Decided March 31, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 11 Ill. 2d 520, 144 N.E.2d 609. John E. Cassidy, Sr. for appellant. Robert G. Day for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
356 U.S. 225 (1958) 356 U.S. 225 (1958) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
CANTWELL v. CANTWELL, 356 U.S. 225 (1958) 356 U.S. 225 CANTWELL v. CANTWELL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 766.
Decided March 31, 1958.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 Ind. 168, 143 N.E.2d 275. William C. Wines and John C. Lawyer for appellant. Daniel F. Kelly for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 356 U.S. 225, 226
