UNITED STATES V. TOWNSHIP OF MUSKEGON, 355 U. S. 484 (1958)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 355 U. S. 484
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/355/484/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/355/484/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Township of Muskegon, 355 U.S. 484 (1958)
United States v. Township of Muskegon
No. 37
Argued November 14, 1957
Decided March 3, 1958
355 U.S. 484
Syllabus
Under Michigan Public Act 189 of 1953, the Township of Muskegon assessed against a private corporation engaged in business for profit taxes based on the value of real property owned by the United States and used by the corporation in the course of performing several supply contracts the corporation had with the Government on a cost plus fixed fee basis. There was no lease, and no rent was charged by the Government, but the corporation agreed not to include any part of the cost of the facilities furnished by the Government in the price of the goods supplied under the contracts.
Held: this tax does not invade the constitutional immunity of federal property from taxation by the States. United States v. City of Detroit, ante, p. 355 U. S. 466. Pp. 355 U. S. 485-487.
(a) Since the corporation was using the property in connection with its own commercial activities, and not as a mere agent of the Government, a different result is not required by the fact that it was not formally designated a "lessee." P. 355 U. S. 486.
(b) Since the corporation was acting as a private enterprise selling goods to the Government, a different result is not required by the fact that it was using the property in carrying out a contract with the Government. Pp. 355 U. S. 486-487.
346 Mich. 218, 77 N.W.2d 799, affirmed.