Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/319/103/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/319/103/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)
Jones v. Opelika
No. 280, October Term, 1941
Reargued March 10, 11, 1943
Decided May 3, 1943
319 U.S. 103
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Syllabus
Upon rehearing, 318 U.S. 796, the judgments heretofore entered in these cases, 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. P. 319 U. S. 104.
242 Ala. 549, 7 So.2d 503, reversed.
202 Ark. 614, 151 S.W.2d 1000, reversed.
58 Ariz. 144, 118 P.2d 97, reversed.
PER CURIAM (announced by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS).
The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Murdock v. Pennsylvania, post, p. 319 U. S. 105. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in the Murdock case and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed.
So ordered.
For dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE REED, and MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, see post, pp. 319 U. S. 117-140.
