FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SAN JOSE V. CALIFORNIA, 262 U. S. 366 (1923)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 262 U. S. 366
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/262/366/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/262/366/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
First National Bank of San Jose v. California, 262 U.S. 366 (1923)
First National Bank of San Jose v. California
No. 276
Submitted April 13, 1923
Decided June 4, 1923
262 U.S. 366
Syllabus
A state law providing for the escheat to the bank deposits after they have remained intact and unclaimed for more than twenty years, when no notice of his residence has been filed with the bank by the depositor or any claimant, is void as applied to deposits in National Banks. Calif.Code Civ.Proc. § 1273; U.S.Rev.Stats. § 5136. P. 262 U. S. 369.
186 Cal. 746 reversed.
Error to a judgment of the Supreme Court of California affirming a judgment for the state against the plaintiff in error bank in an action to declare unclaimed deposits escheated to the state.