UNITED STATES V. ALASKA STEAMSHIP CO., 253 U. S. 113 (1920)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 253 U. S. 113
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/253/113/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/253/113/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Alaska Steamship Co., 253 U.S. 113 (1920)
United States v. Alaska Steamship Company
No. 541
Argued December 16, 17, 1919
Decided May 17, 1920
253 U.S. 113
Syllabus
This Court will determine only matters actually in controversy essential to the decision of the particular case before it. P. 253 U. S. 115.
In a suit in which the Interstate Commerce Commission was temporarily enjoined from requiring interstate and water carriers to use certain forms of bills of lading in domestic and export transportation upon the ground that the Commission lacked power to prescribe them, held that, since the Transportation Act of February 28, 1920, passed pending the interlocutory appeal, contained provisions which would necessitate changes in both forms of bills, the case had become moot, and the Court could not pass upon the Commission's authority, but would reverse the order of injunction, no longer needed to protect the complainants against the order of the Commission involved in the suit, without prejudice to the right to assail any such order adopted after the new legislation, and without costs to either party. Id.
259 F.7d 3 reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.