Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/215/226/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/215/226/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Southern Pacific Co. v. ICC, 215 U.S. 226 (1909)
Southern Pacific Company v.
Interstate Commerce Commission
No. 275
Argued October 12, 13, 1909
Decided December 6, 1909
215 U.S. 226
CERTIFICATE OF THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
On authority of preceding case, held that, under § 1 of the Expediting Act of February 11, 1903, c. 544, 32 Stat. 823, the case, although turning only on a point of law, cannot be certified to this Court in absence of any judgment, opinion, decision, or order determinative of the case below.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case comes here upon a certificate of the three judges of the Circuit Court for the Northern District of California under § 1 of the Expediting Act of February 11, 1903, 32 Stat. 823, c. 544, as construed by them.
The suit was brought by the railroad companies in the circuit court, to restrain the enforcement of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which established a
maximum rate for the transportation of rough green fir lumber from points in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, to San Francisco. The case came on for argument before the three circuit judges upon the demurrer of the Commission to the amended bill of complaint, to which was attached the opinion and order of the Commission.
The circuit judges certified the whole case, and it comes here without opinion, decision, or assignment of errors.
Upon the grounds stated in No. 339, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission, ante, p. 215 U. S. 216, the certificate is dismissed and the case remanded to the Circuit Court with directions to proceed therein in conformity with law.
Ordered accordingly.
