SCHICK V. UNITED STATES, 195 U. S. 65 (1904)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 195 U. S. 65
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/195/65/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/195/65/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1904)
Schick v. United States
Nos. 222-223
Argued December 2, 1903
Decided May 31, 1904
195 U.S. 65
Syllabus
A written waiver of a jury by a defendant in an action brought by the United States to recover a penalty of fifty dollars under § 11 of the act of 1886 as amended by the Act of May 9, 1902, is not in conflict with the laws and Constitution of the United States, and does not invalidate the judgment.
McCray v. United States, ante, p. 195 U. S. 27, followed as to constitutionality of the oleomargarine legislation.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.