FLOYD v. LANDRUM

Annotate this Case

FLOYD v. LANDRUM
1923 OK 819
219 P. 650
93 Okla. 168
Case Number: 11686
Decided: 10/23/1923
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

FLOYD
v.
LANDRUM.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Absence of Briefs-- Dismissal. Where no briefs have been filed under rule 7 (215 P. vii) of this court, and no application for extension of time has been asked for, and no excuse offered for failure to comply with the requirements of said rule, the appeal may be dismissed.

Graham & Logsdon, for plaintiff in error.
R. A. Keller, for defendant in error.

FOSTER, C.

¶1 This is an appeal from the action of the district court of Love county, Okla., in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant in error. The cause was duly reached for hearing upon the docket of this court submitted, and assigned for the preparation of an opinion. Upon an examination of the record, it appears that no briefs have been filed in this cause in compliance with rule 7 (215 P. vii) of this court, no request made for an extension of time, and no excuse offered for failure to comply with the requirements of said rule. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.