MOSKOWITZ v. MILLER

Annotate this Case

MOSKOWITZ v. MILLER
1923 OK 703
218 P. 794
92 Okla. 193
Case Number: 11762
Decided: 09/25/1923
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MOSKOWITZ et al.
v.
MILLER.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Failure of Plaintiff in Error to File Brief -- Dismissal -- Judgment on Supersedeas Bond.
Where the defendant in error files a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the failure of the plaintiffs in error to file briefs within the time required by the rules of this court, and attaches to said motion a certified copy of the supersedeas bond, and prays for judgment thereon, this court will dismiss the appeal and render judgment on said supersedeas bond.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2.

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; L. J. Martin, Judge.

Action by Olga Miller against Harry Moskowitz and Ben Moskowitz, as partners, doing business as the Oklahoma Realty Company, for commission in the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Motion by defendant in error to dismiss appeal and for judgment on supersedeas bond. Dismissed.

Robinson & Meiher, for plaintiffs in error.
Bell, Hickman & Salter, for defendant in error.

ESTES, C.

¶1 This cause is for hearing on the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal herein because no brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, under the rules of this court, and for judgment on the supersedeas bond, certified copy of which is attached to said motion. On April 24, 1923, it was duly ordered that plaintiff in error file brief on or before July 1, 1923. Thereafter, on the 3rd day of July, 1923, an extension of 20 days was by this court allowed in which to file such brief. Plaintiffs in error have wholly failed to do so, and no excuse offered.

¶2 It is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that Olga Miller, defendant in error, have and recover of and from Harry Moskowitz and Ben Moskowitz, principals, and Abe Smith and John Moskowitz, sureties on said supersedeas bond, the sum of $ 400, with interest at the rate of six per cent. from the 19th day of March, 1920, and all costs of this action, for which let execution issue.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.