United States v. Covilland
66 U.S. 339

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Covilland, 66 U.S. 1 Black 339 339 (1861)

United States v. Covilland

66 U.S. (1 Black) 339

Syllabus

1. A confirmation of a Mexican land title in a proceeding conducted in the name of the original grantee is binding upon the United States, and upon all the assignees of the original grantee.

2. When a survey is executed conformably to the decree of confirmation, the alienees of the original grantee may intervene to protect their own rights.

3. When the survey is completed, and a patent issued to the original grantee, his assignees can assert their rights against him in the ordinary courts of the country.

4. But the extraordinary tribunals, proceeding under the act of 1851, cannot order a second patent to issue for a part of the land previously confirmed to the original grantee.

5. If such a decree were made, it would not bind the government, and would be a nullity as between the original grantee and his assignees.

Charles Covilland, Jose Manuel Ramirez, William H. Sampson, administrator of John Sampson, Charles B. Sampson, Robert B. Buchanan, and Gabriel N. Suezy, presented their petition to the Board of Land Commissioners at San Francisco on

Page 66 U. S. 340

the 31st of May, 1852, claiming to be confirmed in their title to two tracts of land lying on the Yuba and the Feather Rivers. The title set forth in the petition was derived from Captain John A. Sutter, whom the petitioners alleged to be a regular and legal grantee from the Mexican government. It was alleged that Sutter had two grants, one made by Governor Alvarado for eleven leagues, in 1841, and the other by Micheltorena, in 1845, for twenty-two leagues, and the land claimed in the present case was averred to be part of these grants. The conveyances from Sutter to the petitioners were set out and produced before the board.

The evidence which the petitioners laid before the board and before the district court to establish the title of Sutter under his two grants was nearly the same in this case as in the case of Sutter v. United States, 21 How. 170, where there was a final decree confirming his claim under the title from Alvarado for eleven leagues, and rejecting that under the Micheltorena title for twenty-two leagues.

The record does not show precisely what quantity of land was conveyed by Sutter to Covilland and his associates, but the boundaries described in the deeds include a comparatively small part of Sutter's original claim. The board of commissioners confirmed the claim of the petitioners for the quantity of land included in their deeds as part and parcel of the lands granted to Sutter, and previously confirmed by the board to him.

Upon appeal by the United States to the district court, the decree of the board was confirmed with certain immaterial modifications, and this appeal to the Supreme Court was then taken by the United States.

Page 66 U. S. 341

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.