Youngblood v. West Virginia
547 U.S. ___ (2006)

Annotate this Case

547 U. S. ____ (2006)
547 U. S. ____ (2006)
547 U. S. ____ (2006)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

DENVER A. YOUNGBLOOD, Jr. v. WEST VIRGINIA

on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of west virginia

No. 05–6997. Decided June 19, 2006

   Justice Kennedy, dissenting.

   The Court’s order to grant, vacate, and remand (GVR) in Lawrence v. Chater,516 U. S. 163 (1996) (per curiam), had my assent. In that case there was a new administrative interpretation that the Court of Appeals did not have an opportunity to consider. Id., at 174. The Court today extends the GVR procedure well beyond Lawrence and the traditional practice of issuing a GVR order in light of some new development. See id., at 166–167. Since the issuance of a GVR order simply for further explanation is, as Justice Scalia explains, see ante, p. ___, both improper and contrary to our precedents, I respectfully dissent.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.