Pliler v. Ford
542 U.S. 225 (2004)

Annotate this Case

542 U. S. ____ (2004)
542 U. S. ____ (2004)
542 U. S. ____ (2004)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
NO. 03-221

CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. RICHARD HERMAN FORD

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

[June 21, 2004]

   Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Souter joins, concurring in the judgment.

   While I fully agree with the views expressed by Justice Ginsburg, post, p. 1, and Justice Breyer, post, p. 1 (dissenting opinions), I am persuaded that the judgment entered by the Court—remanding to the Ninth Circuit to determine the propriety of equitable tolling—is both consistent with those views and correct. I therefore concur in that judgment.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.