HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, v. BRIECKAnnotate this Case
488 U.S. 226 (1988)
U.S. Supreme Court
HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, v. BRIECK, 488 U.S. 226 (1988)488 U.S. 226
HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, A DIVISION OF DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. v.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Argued October 31, 1988
Decided December 12, 1988
822 F.2d 52, dismissed.
Andrew M. Kramer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Erwin N. Griswold, David A. Copus, Patricia A. Dunn, and James P. Hollihan.
Brian J. Martin argued the cause for the United States et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. On the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Reynolds, Deputy Solicitor General Merrill, Charles A. Rothfeld, and Charles A. Shanor.
James H. Logan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Julius L. Chambers, Charles Stephen Ralston, Ronald L. Ellis, and Eric Schnapper.*
[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America by John C. Unkovic and Stephen A. Bokat; and for the Equal Employment Advisory Council by Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Ann Elizabeth Reesman.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American Association of Retired Persons by Alfred Miller, Steven S. Honigman, Christopher G. Mackaronis, and Cathy Ventrell-Monsees; and for the Plaintiff Employment Lawyers Association by Paul H. Tobias.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
JUSTICE WHITE dissents.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.