Camp v. Pitts
411 U.S. 138 (1973)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138 (1973)

Camp v. Pitts

No. 72-864

Decided March 26, 1973

411 U.S. 138

Syllabus

The appropriate standard for judicial review of a decision by the Comptroller of the Currency denying a national bank charter is whether his adjudication was "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law." The District Court is to review the administrative record already in existence, supplemented if necessary by affidavits or testimony amplifying the reason for the Comptroller's decision, and is not authorized by the National Bank Act or the Administrative Procedure Act to conduct a de novo hearing in which the "substantial evidence" test is to be applied. Cf. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe,401 U. S. 402.

Certiorari granted; 463 F.2d 632, vacated and remanded.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.