HOLDEN v. ARNEBERGH
394 U.S. 102 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HOLDEN v. ARNEBERGH, 394 U.S. 102 (1969)

394 U.S. 102

HOLDEN ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 945.
Decided March 3, 1969.

265 Cal. App. 2d 87, 71 Cal. Rptr. 401, appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.

Page 394 U.S. 102, 103




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.