ROSSO v. PUERTO RICO
393 U.S. 14 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ROSSO v. PUERTO RICO, 393 U.S. 14 (1968)

393 U.S. 14

ROSSO ET UX. v. PUERTO RICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 242.
Decided October 14, 1968.

___ P. R. R. ___, appeal dismissed.

Walter L. Newsom, Jr., and James B. Donovan for appellants.

Rafael A. Rivera-Cruz, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, J. F. Rodriguez-Rivera, Deputy Solicitor General, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


ROBERTS, JUDGE v. POLLARD, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/14/case.html">393 U.S. 14</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 14 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ROBERTS, JUDGE v. POLLARD, 393 U.S. 14 (1968)

393 U.S. 14

ROBERTS, JUDGE, ET AL. v. POLLARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 251.
Decided October 14, 1968.

283 F. Supp. 248, affirmed.

Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 14, 15

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.