CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES
390 U.S. 715 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 715 (1968)

390 U.S. 715

CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF ILLINOIS. No. 1141.
Decided April 22, 1968.*

Affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1146, School District of Philadelphia et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Lee A. Freeman, William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Joseph L. Alioto, John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Robert L. Meade, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, David G. Budd, Assistant Attorney General of Ohio, Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Thomas W. Mack, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, Benjamin F. Yancey, Jr., Deputy Attorney General of West Virginia, Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, George F. Sieker and Theodore L. Priebe, Assistant Attorneys General of Wisconsin, J. Lee Rankin, Raymond F. Simon, Thomas M. O'Connor and Robert M. Desky for appellants in No. 1141. David Berger and Herbert B. Newberg for appellants in No. 1146.

Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Turner for the United States in both cases. Horace S. Manges, Donald J. Williamson, Don H. Reuben, Lawrence Gunnels, Bernard G. Segal, Edward W. Mullinix, Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Philip W. Tone, W. Donald McSweeney, Harry I. Rand, Samuel Weisbard, Harry Buchman, Robert H. Davison, George B. Christensen,

Page 390 U.S. 715, 716

H. Templeton Brown, Lee N. Abrams, James F. Dwyer, Leo Rosen, Roger Bryant Hunting and Robert C. Keck for appellees Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., et al., in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction and set the cases for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.