RATNER v. CALIFORNIA
388 U.S. 442 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

RATNER v. CALIFORNIA, 388 U.S. 442 (1967)

388 U.S. 442

RATNER ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 10.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Richard A. Lavine for petitioners.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 442, 443




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.