GUY v. TAHASH
385 U.S. 12 (1966)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

GUY v. TAHASH, 385 U.S. 12 (1966)

385 U.S. 12

GUY v. TAHASH, WARDEN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 169, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 385 U.S. 12, 13


BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/12/case.html">385 U.S. 12</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 12 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, 385 U.S. 12 (1966)

385 U.S. 12

BOOKCASE, INC., ET AL. v. LEARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE
CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 332.
Decided October 10, 1966.

18 N. Y. 2d 71, 218 N. E. 2d 668, appeal dismissed.

Emanuel Redfield and Benjamin E. Winston for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin and Frank S. Hogan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.