PUGACH v. NEW YORK
382 U.S. 20 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

PUGACH v. NEW YORK, 382 U.S. 20 (1965)

382 U.S. 20

PUGACH v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided October 11, 1965.

15 N. Y. 2d 65, 204 N. E. 2d 176, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Page 382 U.S. 20, 21


PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/20/case.html">382 U.S. 20</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 20 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, 382 U.S. 20 (1965)

382 U.S. 20

PRICE, DBA HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. No. 144.
Decided October 11, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

Carney M. Layne and Charles W. Yeager for appellant.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Philip J. Graziani and C. Robert Sarver, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed in light of the representations of the Attorney General of West Virginia that there is open to the appellant an effective state procedure of which he has not availed himself.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.