FERNANDEZ v. BABARE
382 U.S. 107 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FERNANDEZ v. BABARE, 382 U.S. 107 (1965)

382 U.S. 107

FERNANDEZ v. BABARE ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided November 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

Howard R. Lonergan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 107, 108


MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/107/case.html">382 U.S. 107</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 107 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT, 382 U.S. 107 (1965)

382 U.S. 107

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 497.
Decided November 15, 1965.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 498, Detroit Edison Co. v. City of Detroit, also on appeal from the same court.

374 Mich. 543, 132 N. W. 2d 660, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas G. Long, James M. Smith and Donald E. Brown for appellant in No. 497. Harvey A. Fischer and Richard Ford for appellant in No. 498.

John H. Witherspoon for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.