KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA
372 U.S. 703 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 703 (1963)

372 U.S. 703

KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. No. 809.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 372 U.S. 703, 704


JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/703/case.html">372 U.S. 703</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 703 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 703 (1963)

372 U.S. 703

JOHNSON ET UX. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 781.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 203 Cal. App. 2d 712, 22 Cal. Rptr. 149.

Leslie W. Irving and Scott D. Kellogg for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorney General, and N. B. Peek and Warren J. Abbott, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.