AHOYIAN v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY
371 U.S. 186 (1962)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

AHOYIAN v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, 371 U.S. 186 (1962)

371 U.S. 186

AHOYIAN ET AL. v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 473.
Decided December 3, 1962.

211 F. Supp. 668, affirmed.

J. Fleet Cowden for appellants.

Edward O. Proctor, Arthur E. Sutherland and Kevin Hern for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


NAPIER v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/371/186/case.html">371 U.S. 186</a> (1962) 371 U.S. 186 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NAPIER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 186 (1962)

371 U.S. 186

NAPIER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
No. 452, Misc.
Decided December 3, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 298 F.2d 445.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 371 U.S. 186, 187

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.