PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINIAnnotate this Case
364 U.S. 478 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI, 364 U.S. 478 (1960)364 U.S. 478
PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
Decided December 5, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 8 N. Y. 2d 903, 168 N. E. 2d 823.
Arthur C. Fink for appellant.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.