DUNN v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 357 U.S. 344 (1958)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

DUNN v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 357 U.S. 344 (1958) 357 U.S. 344

DUNN ET AL. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 952.
Decided June 23, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 155 Cal. App. 2d 789, 318 P.2d 795.

Henry W. Robinson for appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy for the County of Los Angeles, appellee.

Roger J. Whiteford, John J. Wilson, Oscar John Dorwin and Ray A. Pittman, Jr., for the Texas Company, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 357 U.S. 344, 345

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

DUNN v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 357 U.S. 344 (1958) 357 U.S. 344 DUNN ET AL. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 952.
Decided June 23, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 155 Cal. App. 2d 789, 318 P.2d 795.

Henry W. Robinson for appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy for the County of Los Angeles, appellee.

Roger J. Whiteford, John J. Wilson, Oscar John Dorwin and Ray A. Pittman, Jr., for the Texas Company, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 357 U.S. 344, 345