AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOC. v. POWER AUTHORITY
355 U.S. 64 (1957)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOC. v. POWER AUTHORITY, 355 U.S. 64 (1957)

355 U.S. 64

AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. POWER AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK
ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 477.
Decided November 18, 1957.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss the petition on the ground that the cause is moot.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 132, 247 F.2d 538.

Northcutt Ely and Robert L. McCarthy for petitioners.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, and John R. Davison, Solicitor General, for the State of New York, and Thomas F. Moore, Jr., Frederick P. Lee and Ralph A. Gilchrist for the Power Authority of New York, respondents.

A brief as amici curiae was filed by Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Charles E. Corker, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California; Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John B. Barnard, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Colorado; Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, for the State of Nevada; Fred M. Standley, Attorney General, and Paul L. Billhymer, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico; Will Wilson, Attorney General, James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, and James W. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Texas; E. R. Callister, Attorney General, for the State of Utah; and Thomas O. Miller, Attorney General, for the State of Wyoming.

Page 355 U.S. 64, 65

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the petition upon the ground that the cause is moot.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.