Moore v. Bay - 284 U.S. 4 (1931)


U.S. Supreme Court

Moore v. Bay, 284 U.S. 4 (1931)

Moore v. Bay

No. 27

Argued October 22, 1931

Decided November 2, 1931

284 U.S. 4

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

1. The provisions of the Bankruptcy Act concerning liens are superior to state laws. P. 284 U. S. 5.

2. In the administration of an estate in bankruptcy, a chattel mortgage which, under the state law, is bad a against creditors who were such at the date of the mortgage, or who became such between the date of the mortgage and the date on which it was recorded, should not be given priority over those who gave the bankrupt credit at a later date, after the mortgage was on record. Bankruptcy Act, §§ 70, 67, and 65. Id.

45 F.2d 449 reversed.

Certiorari, 283 U.S. 814, to review an affirmance of an order of the district court holding a chattel mortgage to be valid as to creditors whose claims came into existence subsequently to its recordation.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

The bankrupt executed a mortgage of automobiles, furniture, showroom, and shop equipment that is admitted to be bad as against creditors who were such at the date

Page 284 U. S. 5

of the mortgage, and those who became such between the date of the mortgage and that on which it was recorded, there having been a failure to observe the requirements of the Civil Code of California, § 3440. The question raised is whether the mortgage is void also as against those who gave the bankrupt credit at a later date, after the mortgage was on record. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an order of the District Judge giving the mortgage priority over the last creditors. 45 F.2d 449. Whether the court was right must be decided by the Bankruptcy Act, since it is superior to all state laws upon the subject. Globe Bank v. Martin, 236 U. S. 288, 236 U. S. 298.

The trustee in bankruptcy gets the title to all property which has been transferred by the bankrupt in fraud of creditors or which, prior to the petition, he could by any means have transferred, or which might have been levied upon and sold under judicial process against him. Act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 70; U.S.Code, Title 11, § 110. By § 67, Code, Title 11, § 107(a), claims which, for want of record or for other reasons, would not have been valid liens as against the claims of the creditors of the bankrupt shall not be liens against his estate. The rights of the trustee by subrogation are to be enforced for the benefit of the estate. The Circuit Courts of Appeal seem generally to agree, as the language of the Bankruptcy Act appears to us to imply very plainly, that what thus is recovered for the benefit of the estate is to be distributed in "dividends of an equal percentum . . . on all allowed claims, except such as have priority or are secured." Bankruptcy Act, § 65, Code, title 11, § 105. In re Kohler, 159 F. 871; Mullen v. Warner, 11 F.2d 62; Campbell v. Dalbey, 23 F.2d 229; Cohen v. Schultz, 43 F.2d 340; Globe Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin, 236 U. S. 288, 236 U. S. 305.

Decree reversed.



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.