Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Woodford
234 U.S. 46 (1914)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U.S. 46 (1914)

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Woodford

No. 531

Motion to dismiss submitted March 23, 1914

Decided May 25, 1914

234 U.S. 46

Syllabus

In order that the denial of a federal right may be the basis of reviewing the judgment of the state court, the claim of federal right must be made in the state court in the manner required by the state practice, and unless there is an unwarranted resort to rules of practice by the state court to evade decision of the federal question, this Court will not review the judgment.

Raising the federal claim of right on motion for new trial is not sufficient unless the court actually passes upon and denies the claim, and a decision by the appellate court that the federal claim was not properly raised is not a denial of the federal right, but merely an enforcement of a rule of state practice.

Writ of error to review 152 Ky. 398 dismissed.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court under § 237, Judicial Code, are stated in the opinion.

Page 234 U. S. 48

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.