Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. Moore
233 U.S. 182 (1914)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. Moore, 233 U.S. 182 (1914)

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Moore

No. 451

Argued February 26, 1914

Decided April 6, 1914

233 U.S. 182

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Syllabus

Decided on authority of the preceding case.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendants in error brought suit in the district court of Lincoln County, Oklahoma, against the plaintiff in error, for damages, alleging that they were the owners of a certain racehorse which had been shipped by

Page 233 U. S. 183

them over the railroad of the plaintiff in error from Kansas City, Missouri, to Lawrence, Kansas, and which had been injured in transit. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendants in error, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma (36 Okl. 433).

It appears that the horse, for the injury to which this suit was brought, was a part of the shipment under which the horse in the previous case of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, just decided, p. 233 U. S. 173, was carried as therein stated, and that the facts relating to the shipment and cause of injury set forth in the present case are the same as those in the Robinson case. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, after noticing the fact that, except as to the value of the animals, the extent of their injuries and the resulting damages, the two cases were identical in every material feature, followed the Robinson case.

The present case therefore is controlled by the decision in the Robinson case, and, from what we have there said, it follows that the judgment here under review must be reversed.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY dissents.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.